RUNLog

Five systems, four sectors, one method.

The range is the point: hiring, sales, outreach, sourcing. The same discipline transfers because the failure modes are the same everywhere: silent duplicates, unbounded spend, confident guesses, and nobody able to say what actually ran.

IdxSystemSectorStackState

Two of these are recruitment systems that solve different problems: AutoRecruit moves candidates through a pipeline; the retrieval layer answers questions from a grounded knowledge base. Three of these are my own builds, one is a productized build, and one was a client delivery; each page says which.

AutoRecruit

LIVE · 6 OF 8 WORKFLOWS ACTIVE

The whole hiring pipeline in one recruiter portal, backed by eight n8n workflows. Built so a confidently wrong automated rejection cannot happen quietly.

Read the AutoRecruit case
AUTORECRUIT / PORTAL / APPLICANTS DEMO DATA
AutoRecruit applicants dashboard with candidates tracked across hiring stages
FIG. 01 Applicants tracked across stages, with filtering by stage and position. Candidate details are redacted; the records shown are test data.

AutoClose

PRODUCTIZED BUILD

Capture through close in one platform: AI lead scoring, automated multi-channel follow-up, integrated scheduling, and a complete interaction history per lead.

Read the AutoClose case
AUTOCLOSE / CONSOLE / REPORTS DEMO DATA
AutoClose reports view with response rates broken down by channel
FIG. 02 Response rates by channel, computed by the system instead of assembled by hand. Figures are seeded demo content.

Cold email engine

LIVE · 7 OF 7 WORKFLOWS ACTIVE

Seven interlocking workflows that bound sending reputation by design: hard daily quotas per inbox, one sender per prospect, follow-ups timed in business days, and sequences that stop on reply.

Read the cold email case
COLD EMAIL / N8N / WORKFLOW LIBRARY LIVE
n8n workflow library listing the seven cold email workflows, all active
FIG. 03 The library: all seven workflows active, from sourcing to reply handling.

Recruitment retrieval layer

BUILT · ANSWERS TRACE TO A SOURCE

A retrieval-grounded email system rather than a chatbot bolted onto an inbox. Hybrid search plus reranking over a curated knowledge base, and a question with no source gets flagged to a person instead of an invented answer.

Read the retrieval layer case
RETRIEVAL LAYER / SYSTEM MAP DIAGRAM
CLASSIFY EMAIL FRONT DOOR PARSE QUESTIONS ONE OR MANY HYBRID SEARCH SEMANTIC + KEYWORD RERANK BEST SOURCE WINS ANSWER RATIO GATE ALL OR ESCALATE SEND REPLY SOURCE ATTACHED ESCALATE A PERSON ANSWERS COMPLETE PARTIAL
FIG. 04 The complete-or-flagged design: a partial answer never goes out dressed as a full one.

Sponsor sourcing pipeline

DELIVERED · $2.87 SPEND AGAINST A $5 CEILING

249 prioritized local businesses for a creator to pitch, delivered with contact and social details, at roughly a cent of API spend per business. The cost ceiling was passed in at runtime, so an expanded run cannot surprise anyone with a bill.

Read the sourcing pipeline case
SOURCING PIPELINE / SYSTEM MAP DIAGRAM
SEARCH SPACE CITIES x TERMS PULL DATA UNDER A $ CAP ENRICH OWN SITE, FREE CLASSIFY NAME, NOT TERM PRIORITIZE DEDUPED LIST THE CAP IS AN ARGUMENT TO THE RUN, NOT A HOPE.
FIG. 05 Five stages, re-runnable. New cities or categories are a config change, not a rebuild.